Curious about who I am? Posts about health and natural birth Resources and posts regarding vaccines and informed consent Posts about Parenting and Relationships Spirituality and Life Lessons Email me Home
Showing posts with label Pregnancy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pregnancy. Show all posts

Neglected Research and the Administration of Tdap During Pregnancy

 
On October 24 of last year (2012), the ACIP voted 14 to 1 in the recommendation of administering a pertussis booster (Adacel or Boostrix) during every pregnancy regardless of vaccination history, preferably after 20 weeks gestation.[*][*][*]
 
This over ruled the earlier suggestion of the administration of just one booster during the first pregnancy because antibody levels were found to wane substantially during the first year after vaccination. Hence, leading the ACIP to conclude a single dose of Tdap at one pregnancy would be insufficient to provide protection for subsequent pregnancies.[*]
 
In the post below, I will provide published literature as to why this particular approach is not well-founded on actual science or research. I will also provide some information on the relevant risks of pertussis during infancy, the safety concerns of administering Tdap during pregnancy and the modification of pertussis epidemiology due to the current vaccination program.
 
 
Problematic Ambitions in Administering Tdap During Pregnancy
 
The underlining goal in this particular vaccination strategy (according to the CDC) is twofold:[*]
 
Mainly (1) “reduce the burden of pertussis in infants by providing some protection until they are old enough to be vaccinated themselves” [*]
 
Secondly (2) “protect the mother from pertussis around the time of delivery, making her less likely to become infected and transmit pertussis to her infant.” [*]
 
Let us address these individually with published data…
 
 
Reducing the burden of pertussis in infants
 
The goal of reducing pertussis infection within the infant population via vaccination is ambitious and nothing new (Clinical Infectious Diseases 1990).[*][*][*] 
 
Decades of research examining newborn vaccination against pertussis has been amassed; none of which has been enough to implement a national recommendation from the ACIP…until now, with a twist.
 
The CDC now feels strongly that this particular new approach, vaccinating women late term during pregnancy, will provide the protection they are hoping for.
 
Unfortunately, relying on transplacental antibodies to provide protection against pertussis in infants is not based on published evidence.
 
In fact, the very board that recommended Tdap during pregnancy (ACIP) states the effectiveness of maternal anti-pertussis antibodies in preventing infant pertussis is not yet known (ACIP 2011, CDC 2011).[*][*]
 
This is one of two major concerns the ACIP voiced, acknowledging the complete “lack of evidence evaluating that transplacental maternal antibodies induced by Tdap in the protection of infants against pertussis” (Journal of Perinatology 2010).[*]
 
Even if data reflects an increase in infant antibodies to pertussis via maternal vaccination, because there is currently no correlate of protection in pertussis infection, it is uncertain whether this increase could be considered clinically protective (The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2011).[*]
 
This is significant since the transfer of antibodies against pertussis to the offspring is influenced by various factors and determining a benchmark for correlation would aid in establishing if any protection is conferred. (Current known factors that influence transplacental antibodies: the age of women at delivery, mothers’ vaccination history, mothers’ immune response and ability to generate IgG immunoglobulins).[*- Tdap in risk groups 2012]
 
In fact, it is becoming more evident that the (aP) pertussis vaccines do not yield any correlation between antibody levels and protection against pertussis.[* source 17]
 
Currently, I am aware of two completed published studies (as mentioned by the CDC in 2011) providing data that evaluates antibody levels in newborns whose mothers received tdap during pregnancy, neither produce confirmation of protection against infection.[*][*][*]
 
What is certain is the evident “need for larger studies with longer follow-up to help understand the immunologic responses in pregnant women and the consequences on neonatal immunity” (Clinical Infectious Diseases 2013).[*]
 
 
Interference with Infant Immune Response to Primary DTaP Vaccination
(also known as blunting)
 
Data to consider, several studies have suggested that maternal pertussis antibodies can inhibit active pertussis-specific antibody production after administration of DTaP vaccine to infants of mothers vaccinated with Tdap during pregnancy, referred to as blunting (CDC 2011).[*] 
 
In fact, the ACIP states that this phenomenon known as blunting could result in an increase in pertussis susceptibility to children under 12 months (Journal of Perinatology 2010).[*] 
 
The ACIP assumes that maternal pertussis antibodies might reduce an infant's risk for  infection in the first few months of life, but neglects to apply actual data illustrating an increase in risk for disease after receipt of primary DTaP doses (CDC 2011).[*]
 
Instead, the ACIP applies data used in naturally acquired maternal pertussis-specific antibodies, stating that one study completed shows little or no interference between naturally acquired transplacental antibodies and the DTaP series (Clinical Infectious Diseases 2012).[*] 
 
No published literature is available yet for review examining vaccine-induced transplacental antibodies.
 
Based on data that has been completed, blunting does occur, we just don’t know to what degree and what the effects may be.
 
The theorized benefit of vaccinating pregnant mothers is a decline in risk for disease and death in infants aged <3 months, but the trade-off is a potential increase in the occurrence of pertussis in older infants (CDC 2011).[*]
 
According to the ACIP, the potential benefit of protection from maternal antibodies in newborns outweigh the potential risk for shifting disease burden to later in infancy (CDC 2011, The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2011).[*][*]
 
Worth noting, two clinical trials are currently underway (one in Canada, the other in the USA) to evaluate the assess the immune response of infants receiving DTaP immunization at ages 2, 4, and 6 months whose mothers received Tdap during the third trimester of pregnancy (Vaccine 2012).[*][*- Tdap in risk groups 2012]
 
It is unfortunate (and, in my opinion, inappropriate) that this data was not completed prior to recommendation .
 
 
Evidence for Safety
 
Although in prelicensure evaluations, the safety of administering a booster dose of Tdap to pregnant women was not studied. The ACIP Pertussis Vaccines Work Group declares safety and expresses it as well established (CDC 2011).[*]
 

What does ‘well established’ mean exactly….
 
The data that is used to established safety which resulted in the ACIP’s recommendation was collected from:

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

Sanofi Pasteur pregnancy registry

GlaxoSmithKline pregnancy registry
 
 
The ACIP asserts that no data collected suggests any elevated frequency or unusual patterns of adverse events in pregnant women who received Tdap (CDC 2011, Can Fam Physician. 2013).[*][*]
 
It is worth noting, all three are passive surveillance programs which have several limitations which include: unverified reports, underreporting, inconsistent data quality and absence of an unvaccinated control group (Drug Safety 2008).[*] 
 
 
Data Evaluated From VAERS:
 

-Only 130 reports met safety research criteria (AJOG 2012).   [*] 
 

-The data was collected before Tdap was routinely recommended in pregnancy (AJOG 2012). [*]
 

-Only 3% of women were administered the vaccine in the recommended third trimester (77% in the first trimester, 19% second trimester, 3% third trimester) (AJOG 2012). [*] 
 

The most frequent pregnancy-specific adverse event was spontaneous abortion occurring in 16% of reports (AJOG 2012). [*] 
 
 
GlaxoSmithKline Registry:


From GSK pregnancy registry: “The safety of Boostrix (tdap) during pregnancy has not been established, and no adequate human studies have been performed. [*]


None of these products, except RETROVIR® (zidovudine, AZT) after the first trimester, is approved for use during pregnancy.”[*] 
 
 
Sanofi Pasteur Registry:
 

From the Sanofi Pasteur pregnancy registry: “This is a company-run, passive, pregnancy surveillance system designed to collect and analyze the outcome of vaccination.” [*]


“There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of Adacel in pregnant women and data are limited. Sanofi Pasteur does not recommend the use of Adacel vaccine in any manner other than that described in the package insert.”[*][*][*]
 
 
From a safety perspective, ACIP adds that administration of Tdap after 20 weeks' gestation is preferred in the hope to minimize the risk for any low-frequency adverse event and the possibility that any spurious association might appear causative.[*]
 
 
Risk of pertussis infection


In all honesty, when it comes down to it – expecting mothers are going to make the decision to get the Tdap booster if the perceived benefits outweigh any risk.
 
One could read 30 peer reviewed publication arguing for (and against) Tdap during pregnancy, but it always comes down to perceived risk.
 
To estimate risk and the potential impact of Tdap administered during pregnancy, let us evaluate the data and statistics from 2010-2011.
 
Using the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System during 2000–2011, the annual mean of pertussis cases in infants aged <12 months was 2,746 cases - with deaths equaling to 18.[*]
 
Using the 2010 birth rate (4,007,000 live births) and this data, we can determine the following risk assessment for 2010:[*]


Without Vaccination:

Risk pertussis infection under 12 months = 0.007%

Risk of death = 0.000004%

 

With Vaccination:

Risk of pertussis infection under 12 months = 0.005%

Risk of death = 0.000002%
 
 
Not to make light of pertussis infection, but more people died of being struck by lightning (count = 29)  then babies dying of pertussis infection in 2010.[*]
 
Yet, I’m pretty sure mothers perceive the risk of pertussis as more glaring then being struck by lightning.
 



Changing epidemiology due to vaccination and the increased risk to infants
 
 
Everyone is quick to  proclaim the benefits of herd immunity when vaccinating, yet not so many are so swift as to declare its faults (such as protecting some while placing others at greater risk).
 
The implementation of a vaccine against pertussis infection, with decreasing natural boosting,  has changed the epidemiology of infection to the disease.[*]
 
The resurgence of pertussis in the post-vaccination era has been widely documented. In fact, it is the chief reason for the ACIP recommendation in vaccinating pregnant mothers. 


The overall incidence of pertussis has been increasing steadily
 since 2007 and has now surpassed peak rates observed
 during 2004-2005. source


Yet, a shift of cases from school-age children to adolescents, adults and children under 1 year of age has been described in the last decade. As a consequence, pertussis circulating in these new populations is considered  being the source of infection for infants and newborns (The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2011, BMC Infectious Diseases 2013). [*][*]
 
One study that examined the increase of pertussis in California between 2006 and 2011, demonstrated decaying protection against pertussis during 5 years after a child’s fifth dose of the Tdap booster. The authors state this waning might be one of the causes of reported increased infection in adolescents which increases the risk of transmission to infants (Can Fam Physician 2013).[*]

source here - CDC
 
The solution for a severely limited booster vaccine? Cocooning.
 
Unfortunately, this strategy of cocooning (vaccinating pregnant women immediately postpartum and all other close contacts of infants with Tdap) to reduce the risk for transmission of pertussis to infants is an insufficient strategy (CDC 2011).[*]
 
The ACIP recognizes this as well as the CDC(CDC 2011).[*]
 
The solution for this latest failing strategy and inadequate vaccine? Simply, vaccinate during pregnancy. 


 

Which to choose
 
If you still regard the risk of pertussis infection to outweigh any known and unknown risks of vaccinating during pregnancy, then consider this: Please request the Adacel vaccine.
 
The Adacel vaccine contains antigens that intend to elicit antibodies against fimbriae (types 2 and 3) which play a critical role in the attachment of the bacteria to the respiratory cells (which would, in theory, make a mother less likely to transmit the disease to her child).[*][*][*]
 
Boostrix contains mainly antigens that intend to modify and lessen symptoms of disease, which would make a mother more likely to become an asymptomatic carrier of the disease, which places her child more at risk.[* sources 3-8]
 
Information on Tdap boosters:


Boostrix contains: pertussis antigens (inactivated pertussis toxin [PT] 361 and formaldehyde-treated filamentous hemagglutinin [FHA] and pertactin). also  - contains aluminum hydroxide as adjuvant (not more than 0.39 mg aluminum by assay), 4.5 mg of sodium chloride, ≤100 mcg of residual formaldehyde, and 387 ≤100 mcg of polysorbate 80 (Tween 80).
 

Adacel contains: 2.5 mcg detoxified pertussis toxin (PT), 5 mcg filamentous hemagglutinin  (FHA), 3 mcg pertactin (PRN), 5 mcg fimbriae types 2 and 3 (FIM). Also dose includes 1.5 mg aluminum phosphate (0.33 mg aluminum) as the adjuvant, ≤5 mcg residual formaldehyde.
 
 
I would also encourage you to read more about pertussis infection here: CDC Pinkbook Pertussis.




Similar posts:
 
The Perfect Storm - How the increase in pertussis vaccine usage is causing an 'epidemic'


Mandatory Breastfeeding: Yay or Nay?


Some breastfeeding supporters are calling for extreme measures when it comes to the promotion of breastfeeding and the *choice* in infant nutrition. In some cases, many proclaimed supporters feel that mandating breastfeeding would not only benefit the health of the child (and mother) but also our nation as a whole (particularly in terms of health care costs – a savings of $13 billion annually does sounds tempting).

Some push for formula to be treated as a pharmaceutical-like prescription, warranting a doctor’s prescription.

Women giving birth in New York City may have already begun to experience something similar to this due to recent regulations – while NYC mothers are not denied formula if requested, they will receive a mandated discussion from staff on why breast is best and each bottle will be tracked. [*][*]

Some say New York is ahead of its time for embracing such measures. Maybe it is…or maybe the focus should be directed elsewhere. [*]

I, for one, don’t know what to make out of it. Sure, the part of me that wants every baby to be breastfed jumps for joy, but on a certain level, I know the answers to issues like these are not in regulation

High coverage with optimal breastfeeding practices has potentially the single largest impact on child survival of all preventive interventions. [*]

Absolutely, something must be done to get more babies drinking breast milk – but just because breastfeeding is natural, does not mean it is easy.

Sadly, the most recent data from the CDC shows only 16 percent of mothers exclusively breastfeed for the first 6 months of their baby’s life (which is the current AAP and WHO recommendations).[*][*][*][*] 

Even with this dismal statistic - it is essential to note that according to research, the large majority of mothers truly desire to breast-feed their babies exclusively for at least three months. Even though only 1 out of 3 of them will meet this goal, these numbers can not be blamed on a mother’s lack of interest or desire. [*]

Most mothers really want to breastfeed their baby, however, there are certain factors that may improve or worsen the odds of them their goals - which speaks to the underlying problem at hand.

One improvement - mothers of infants that don't receive formula in the hospital are 2.5 times more likely to meet their breast-feeding goals. Also, those who initiate breastfeeding shortly after delivery improve these odds as well. So it seems that the hospital environment, support and information do play a critical role in developing a breastfeeding relationship (at least early on).

So the changes requested from ‘Latch on NYC’ regarding revising hospital protocol, marketing and the restrictive use of free formula may be onto something…[*]

However, if you've ever breastfed – from experience, you realize it is not the first few days that are the most difficult. It's those following weeks when the pain appears and the support your partner is not only important but essential.

Once you overcome the hurdles of hospital and home, then comes another: the workplace. The majority of U.S. mothers return to work and have to manage some type of pumping arrangement with their employer (with the majority of states lacking any regulation of nursing mothers rights).

The few obstacles mentioned above does not begin to scratch the surface of breastfeeding obstacles, consider infection (thrush), growth spurts, nursing strike, premature baby, tongue tie, difficult latch, cracked nipples, separation from baby, difficult birth, multiple births, medications, etc….

All of which can face a mother who is wholeheartedly willing to breastfeed to 6 months.


Should breastfeeding be optional?

For me, this is the wrong question to solve the problem of our current breastfeeding rates.

The number of women I know wanting to breastfeed (who happen to come across challenging obstacles in the first few weeks) far out weigh those few who choose never to breastfeed or who purposefully dry up their milk supply to feed their babies formula instead, by choice.

We should place resources into breastfeeding education and support for women (and their partners).

We should absolutely be more aware of formula marketing techniques.

But where I start to get leery is when we start placing those resources toward the small group of women who adamantly do not want to breastfeed.

These women should not be forced via legislative measures. Besides, how the hell can you force someone to breastfeed? Really, what would be the logistics of it?


A Better Way

So what can we do to help support women meet their goals in feeding their baby while not trampling on personal liberties? 

If you truly want more mothers to breastfeed, do something. Attend a breastfeeding support group for new or expecting mothers. Become active in legislation that protects and supports maternal rights (particularly in the work place-for those pumping moms out there). Encourage pregnant friends/family to meet with a lactation consultant prior to giving birth. Learn more about the obstacles and issues at hand and do what you can in your own social network to help.

Media may give the impression that we are losing this war, but that is not the case!

Breastfeeding rates in the U.S. continue to increase.

The increase seen from the most recent data represents the largest annual increase witnessed over the previous decade with rates rising from 44.3% to 47.2% in babies breastfed to 6 months.[*]

The passion among breastfeeding mothers to support fellow moms reaches worldwide. There already exists international code requiring access to education to mothers regarding the advantages of breastfeeding, recognition of breastfeeding rights and the restriction of marketing misbehavior. [*][*][*]

Yes, breast is best – however, if you consider yourself a lactivist I cannot see how supporting a mandatory breastfeeding law helps and supports mothers. The dilemma of our currently bleak breastfeeding statistics goes much deeper then what a compulsory law is capable to handle.

The solution starts with our awareness in our own ability to influence, educate and support new mothers – each and every one of us (the hospital worker, the coworker, the friend, the sister, the neighbor, the stranger).

With each generation we can observe the support and education growing - this isn’t a time to segregate and impose regulation. Now is the time to connect and do your part!


Lactivist (n.)

            A word combination from the word ‘lactation’ and ‘activist’

One who seeks to promote the health benefits of breastfeeding over formula-feeding and to ensure that nursing mothers are not discriminated against


Image Map


The Epidural: Less Satisfying and More Painful Birth?


Pregnancy and birth are filled with many unpredictable features, whether this be your first go at the rodeo or 5th.

Pain experienced during labor is also unpredictable. Pain may be manageable without medication, or it may become severe and exhausting.

If you find yourself calling the United States your home, then you are among the majority if you opt for epidural pain relief during labor.

Ladies in the U.S. have fewer options for labor pain management than our counterparts in other industrialized nations (such as the UK and Canada). It is uncertain if the excessive use of epidural analgesia is a true preference in the US or if it is simply chosen because of the lack of other presented options.[*]

Interesting, none-the-less….

What is certain is that epidural use is nearly always an elective procedure. Although it can be a useful tool in supporting a laboring mother, the use of epidural medication expands the chance for complications, this does not occur in drastic numbers. Each family has their own comfort level with side effects and risk – what one family may consider safe, another may become uncomfortable. (you can learn more about risks associated with epidural use here and here) 

Everyday, devoted and loving soon-to-be mothers opt for epidural anesthesia pain relief during the birth of their babies.

I was among them, choosing an epidural with my first daughter because I thought it would help with pain and allow me to have a more enjoyable experience. In actuality, I experienced agonizing break-through pain and a cascade of interventions that I wasn’t anticipating (urinary catheterization, artificial rupture of membranes, internal fetal monitoring, use of synthetic oxytocin). 

Was my disillusionment with epidural anesthesia in the minority? 


Higher Pain Recall Among Those Opting for Epidural Analgesia


A remarkable finding from a longitudinal study (2009 BJOG) regarding women’s memory of labor pain found that mothers who opted for epidural analgesia reported higher pain scores at all time points versus those who went without.[*]

Another study (2006 JPOG) substantiates the above findings and also goes to on to provide data that women who received epidural analgesia not only had higher recollection of intense pain at two months and one year but also had greater difficulty forgetting pain 10 months later.[*]

If a mother chooses an epidural in most part to experience a labor that is less painful then one without anesthesia the data above can be sobering.

Research also suggests that pain experienced during labor is not entirely a negative experience, with more then 1 out of 4 women (28%) assessing pain as more of a positive than a negative – suggesting that coping with pain is a rewarding experience for some women.[*]



Lower Satisfaction Among Those Opting for Epidural Analgesia

Although women and care providers may assume that effective pharmaceutical pain relief during labor will ensure a more positive birth experience, there is mounting evidence that the opposite is true.

Several studies have shown that women who use no labor medication are the most satisfied with their labor and birth (times being assessed at time of birth, six weeks and one year after birth).[*][*][*][*][*][*]

Also worth noting, women who cope with labor using non-medical alternatives such as water birth, massage, positioning, focusing and breathing done with the support of another person report more satisfied than with standard pain relief given during childbirth.[*]

Natural techniques utilize a woman’s own strengths and places her in control of her own body. They also have been assessed to improve obstetric outcomes compared to pharmaceutical relief.[*][*] 

Interestingly, the influence of pain relief on satisfaction is not as powerful as the attitudes and behaviors of the mother and caregivers involved. Consider a 2002 study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology which concludes four factors that appear to override pain experienced in labor:[*][*]

1. Personal expectations
2. Amount of support from caregiver
3. Quality of caregiver-patient relationship
4. Mother’s involvement in decision making


This reaffirms the main key to satisfaction and managing labor pain effectively, is to ready yourself in advance – arranging continuous support, accurately understanding pain control options (and the interventions involved) and having an active role in the decision making process.[*][*]

****


As much as some might like to discount natural childbirth as a progressive trend among a small number of women, research affirms that women who opt for epidural anesthesia experience more pain, have a more difficult time forgetting the pain, and experience less satisfaction overall.  

Women do not decline an epidural simply to “win a medal” – instead information on different types of pain relief are assessed and balanced against other goals such as walking, pushing effectively, or minimizing maternal/neonatal side effects and/or risks.

How much of an effect an epidural medication can have on a newborn or mother is not easily predetermined and can vary based on dosage/mix of pharmaceutical drug combination, the length of labor, and each individual.[*]

Opting for an epidural anesthesia is one method (among many) that can aid in relief of pain and discomfort during the labor process. This type of pain relief requires a mother to give some control to the hospital staff. It does involve risk and additional intervention.

The decision, rightfully, rests for each woman to make. In due course, researching the procedure and talking others who have may be able to offer different perspectives could help a mother decide on what is right for them.

As the data suggests, most women who choose unmedicated birth (and prepare for it) find the pain intense but manageable and they are happier with their experience afterwards.


Ultimately, what can be said, each woman should use the insight into herself to be the best guideposts in directing her toward a positive decision regarding pain relief during labor.


"You gain strength, courage and confidence by every experience
 in which you really stop and look fear in the face."
- Eleanor Roosevelt