Curious about who I am? Posts about health and natural birth Resources and posts regarding vaccines and informed consent Posts about Parenting and Relationships Spirituality and Life Lessons Email me Home

The DANGERS of Cloth Diapering

I’ve cloth diapered both of my girls – in fact, I still have one in cloth as we speak (she is 16 months) and as much I am a mega proponent for the use of cloth diapers versus disposables, I find myself secretly dropping hints to my husband that it is time to use disposables.

Unfortunately, I did too good of a job convincing him of the benefits that he is adamant of sticking to our AIO Grovias.  

To be honest, I’m not sure if I would be thinking so much about it, however our care provider stops allowing us to use cloth at the age of 18 months…and that means, very soon, my youngest will only be in cloth diapers when she is at home (not at all throughout the week during the day).

You know, I think I’ve done pretty good with both of my daughters by employing cloth diapers over the years…and I love the many benefits of using cloth (blah blah blah)…but the hazards are becoming ever more pronounced in the last few weeks leading up to my youngest turning 18 months…


this pic luckily doesn't contain poop, but it gives you an
idea of where to look for it in your HE washer
Poop in washer

We have a HE washer and let me tell you – if you aren’t a stickler at removing all poop from your diapers prior to washing then you’ll be swiping poop out of the little rubber crevice between the door and the washer.

There’s nothing like solid poop bits hanging out in the washer when you *think* your laundry is clean.



Demon Diaper sprayer

Piss on diaper sprayers.

Who the hell ever thought it would be a good or even plausible idea to use a hypersensitive, pressurized water gun to clean-up poop over a small 20 inch opening that has a pool of water in it?!

It might not be so bad if I had the time to be meticulous and cautious about using it but I don’t. If you find yourself using a diaper sprayer, I’d like to wager a bet that you most likely have a toddler running around getting into stuff they aren’t suppose to…
evil....

..because toddlers have the keen ability to understand you are COMPLETELY incapacitated at that moment.  

Oh, let me explain something in very clear terms: there is no sanitary, hygienic method to employ a diaper sprayer.

None.



Urine smell

I don’t really recall ever smelling such strong ammonia bouquets coming from disposable diapers.

Yes, yes – you can strip your diapers to remove build up. You can try using another detergent (or you can make your own like we do) but if you use cloth then sooner or later you’re going to deal with reeking urine odor…and its sure to get to the point when this will happen as soon as one infinitesimal droplet of pee touches the cloth diaper.

This particular hazard is compounded when you cosleep.


Expen$ive

Very true – cloth diapers hold the possibility of saving families hundreds of dollars over a course of a year or so but I am curious to see if this actually truly ever happens (in the majority of cases).

You see, once you start buying those cute prints you start to get curious to about other brands...then you’ll find yourself trying out other styles to see if they work any better too (AIO, inserts, AI2, covers, prefolds, organic etc).

You might as well buy another wet bag too and how about another planetwise diaper pail liner or, or maybe try out some fleece liners or see if there is a package deal special going on to get free shipping online over $100 bucks…

If you not careful, you could very well spend just as much if not more on cloth then on disposable diapers, just say’n.


Smelly diaper bin

We wash our diapers every other day and I still have to store my daughter’s diaper bin OUTSIDE of her room in the “office” (a room we coined the office - aka the room where baby items/toys go to die) because the smell becomes a biohazard after 24 hours.

Even after you take the dirty diapers down to the laundry room, the empty plastic bin STILL reeks.

To remedy this problem, we have two diaper pails so we can soak one in bleach water while the other one is in use.


*****

I know that this post might (just a tad) come off like I am strongly against using cloth but after nearly 3 years of cloth diapering, I think I might just be grumpy.

I love that we choose to use cloth to avoid the needless chemicals found in disposables and I love that it helps keep thousands of diapers out of the earth that one day our children will be left with after we are all gone.

But… I’ll be happy when I can find a creative way (oh, hell – who am I kidding, any way) to get rid of those wicked diapers.

ANTI-vaccine vs. PRO-vaccine

If you ask me, if you are someone that has chosen to delay, select or decline a vaccine(s) that does NOT necessarily make you “anti” vaccine…. although, many would find it easier and more comfortable to neatly define the group of individuals that do so into ‘conspiracy theorists’, ‘fear mongerers’ or the ever-so-popular ‘anti-vaccine’.  


 It takes much more effort and intelligence to step away from the polarization of the labels ‘anti’ and ‘pro’ and realize a common goal– and this applies to much more then vaccines…

If you breastfeed and talk about it – then you risk being labeled as ANTI-formula.

If you have a baby naturally and talk about it - then you risk being labeled as ANTI-epidural.

If you commonly employ natural remedies - then you risk being labeled as ANTI-medicine.

If you don’t vaccinate and talk about it - then you risk being labeled as ANTI-vaccine.
 


Questioning the ‘anti-vaccine’ label


When researching for this post, the definition I came across most for the ‘anti-vaccine’ movement was holding an ultimate goal to have as few people vaccinated as possible…for me, this raised a few questions.

Is asking our government to require more stringent tests prior to nationally recommending a vaccine for children ‘anti-vaccine’?


Is examining the benefits and risks prior to administering a vaccine ‘anti vaccine’? Or is it only ‘anti-vaccine’ when you decide the benefit is not great enough?


Is a person ‘anti-vaccine’ because they say that their child suffers from an injury caused by one? Or is it only ‘anti-vaccine’ when you observe that medical professionals seldom associate adverse events occurring hours/days following vaccination?  


Recognizing the separation

You see, it’s NOT the differences between people that result in labeling, name-calling or conflict in general…it is the polarization of separation.

So I ask of you, my readers, to remind yourself to avoid labels and if someone in your life attempts to label you be cautious in your retort.

The next time someone attempts to bait you into conflict by labeling or name calling ask yourself 2 questions before you respond:

Does this need to be said?

Can I respond out of love and kindness?

If you anwser no to either one of these then it’s better to leave it be – not just for the other person, but for you as well!  

YOU Can Stop GMO Salmon from Reaching Your Plate

While you were unwrapping presents over your long Christmas vacation, genetically engineered salmon have met the final stage of FDA approval.

The Aquabounty’s salmon will be the first GE Animal approved for human consumption.

In April 2012, the FDA met assessments by all relevant agencies for approval but was blocked by congress because of safety and environmental concerns.

Last week, the White House has rescinded its order to block the FDA from Aquabounty’s GE Salmon approval.

One of the most concerning issues is the genetic integrity of the food chain. These genetically modified and engineered fish will be introduced into the natural eco system and mate with regular breeds and continue to create hybrid breeds, never being tracked. Another concern is that this salmon will not be labeled so consumers won’t know what they are buying.

Can you take action to keep genetically engineered salmon out of the
U.S.? Yes!

Click here to enter your zip code and find your congressman(woman). I wrote up this letter – simply copy and paste! Then pat yourself on the back and spread the word!


Dear Congressman,

I urge you to direct the FDA to reject the approval of Aquabounty's GE Salmon. The FDA does not currently have adequate safety testing to ensure that these animals will be safe for human health, wild fish populations and the environment.

Worst of all, while consumers have a right to know what's in their food and how it's being produced, under current law, these genetically engineered salmon would not have to be labeled.

There are numerous studies that address and support the health risks associated with, and evidenced by, unprecedented cancer rates caused by long term consumption of GMOs by laboratory animals.

There are long term studies that demonstrate the irrevocable and negative impacts on native populations of species (such as Africanized bees).

These genetically engineered animals should be rejected for consumer and environmental safety reasons.

Thank you for your consideration.



Would you like to read more before sending a email? Read this:



Prescription Drugs and Violence

It’s not just illegal drugs that are associated with violent and aggressive behavior. A well documented correlation exists with many popular drugs (mainly antidepressants/antipsychotic) and acts of hostility, aggression and violence towards others (and ones-self). These pharmaceutical drugs which carry ‘black box’ warnings are increasing in the rate prescribed to adults and children in the US. Should we be surprised to be witnessing an increase in violence in our community and schools?

Increase in diagnosis and drug use

The bible for mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, etc),  The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual’(DSM-5), makes it easy to fit every person and child into neatly defined categories of ‘mental illness’ and once a person is labeled with a specific mental illness(es) they can be prescribed powerful anti-psychotic drugs (even to children as young as 3 years of age) that may or may not be associated with violent or suicidal behavior.

The new revision for the DSM-5 will be published in May of this coming year (2013) and we are guaranteed to witness an increase (specifically in children) that are diagnosed with disorders that are treated with drugs that are associated with aggression. This increase will be to due to more lienant criteria to meet certain diagnoses (such as ADD and anxiety) and many new ‘disorders’ focused on children such as Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder. (If you have yet to read about DMDD may I suggest you do so- here is a good article that provides research that illustrates many flaws of this 'diagnosis' of kids with temper tantrums.)

Am I suggesting that mental health professionals are purposefully trying to push dangerous drugs on as many people as possible – absolutely not. These professionals are trying to help everyone that needs it, however, I think we need to be exceptionally cautious in three area of mental illness management: diagnosis, treatment, and long term use of pharmaceuticals. 


What you can do

If you are considering using or giving your child a drug, check out MedWatch in addition to talking to your doctor. This website is the FDA’s reporting system for adverse events and recalls associated with pharmaceutical drugs. There have been over 11,000 reported events to MedWatch for psychiatric drug side effects related to violence (between 2004-2011).

Speaking specifically to violence and aggressive behavior, check out RxIsk.org. On the website there is a section titled Violence Zone which allows you to enter the name of a drug and see the side effects relating to violence. The data is sorted in organized tables, heat maps, and tag clouds – even interactive graphs that show you what is happening with others taking that same drug around the globe.

RxIsk is a great resource. It is owned by the Data Based Medicine Americas (based in Toronto) and has an international reputation for finding early drug-side effects and risks.

If you are experiencing a side effect due to a pharmaceutical drug – please report it! Drug side effects are a leading cause of death and injury, yet less then 5 percent of serious side effects are reported.

Also, consider signing this petition which is targeting the Committee on Oversight & Government Reform. The petition is asking lawmakers to require an investigation into the role of psychiatric drugs and violence in relation to school shootings and similar acts of violence.

Top 10 associated with violence

Research published last year from ISMP (The Institute for Safe Medication Practices) raised concerns about violent side effects of some very popular antipsychotic drugs (most of which are antidepressants).

This list was reported in Time magazine which can be found here and read to its entirety. I also suggest reading the actual published research found here.

10. Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq) An antidepressant which affects both serotonin and noradrenaline, this drug is 7.9 times more likely to be associated with violence than other drugs.
9. Venlafaxine (Effexor) A drug in the class of antidepressants, it used to treat anxiety disorders. Effexor is 8.3 times more likely than other drugs to be related to violent behavior.
8. Fluvoxamine (Luvox) An antidepressant that affects serotonin (SSRI), Luvox is 8.4 times more likely than other medications to be linked with violence

7. Triazolam (Halcion) A benzodiazepine which can be addictive, used to treat insomnia. Halcion is 8.7 times more likely to be linked with violence than other drugs, according to the study.

6. Atomoxetine (Strattera) Used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Strattera affects the neurotransmitter noradrenaline and is 9 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to the average medication.

5. Mefoquine (Lariam) A treatment for malaria, Lariam has long been linked with reports of bizarre behavior. It is 9.5 times more likely to be linked with violence than other drugs.

4. Amphetamines: (Various) Amphetamines are used to treat ADHD and affect the brain’s dopamine and noradrenaline systems. They are 9.6 times more likely to be linked to violence, compared to other drugs.

3. Paroxetine (Paxil) An SSRI antidepressant, Paxil is also linked with more severe withdrawal symptoms and a greater risk of birth defects compared to other medications in that class. It is 10.3 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to other drugs.

2. Fluoxetine (Prozac) The first well-known SSRI antidepressant, Prozac is 10.9 times more likely to be linked with violence in comparison with other medications.

1. Varenicline (Chantix) The anti-smoking medication Chantix affects the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, which helps reduce craving for smoking. Unfortunately, it’s 18 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to other drugs.

Conclusion

The research reported by the ISMP is valid and raises genuine concern about adverse violent events associated with a particular small group of drugs (of which many are given to children).

It is also significant to state that this report utilizes data from MedWatch which the FDA acknowledges only holds a fraction (1-5%) of side effects because of acute under-reporting.

Please read more about any prescription drug(s) you are considering on using, both on yourself or your child. Consider mentioning these websites if someone you love is using a prescription drug in their recovery process. Also, please contact a healthcare professional if someone you know starts acting aggressively, being disturbingly angry or shows violence to others or themselves.


Read more here:

Frances, Allen. DSM 5 will further inflate the ADD bubble. Psychology Today. Aug 2011

Szalavitz, Maia. Top ten legal drugs linked to violence. Time. Jan 2011

Moore, Thomas. Glenmullen, Joseph. Furberg, Curt. Prescription drugs associated with reports of violence towards others. PLOSOne. 2011


Another School Shooting, Another Psychiatric Drug? Federal Investigation Long Overdue. Citizens commission on human rights international. July 2012

Prescription-Drug-Induced Violence Medicine"s Best Kept Secret? News Guide US – News, articles, press releases. Nov 2012

FDA - MedWatch


Polio-Information on Disease & Vaccine

This post is a continuation of a series that will be providing information on each disease and vaccine that is currently on the CDC’s recommended national immunization schedule.  I hope this information is able to help those attempting to decide on an alternative vaccine schedule (whether that is a delay, select or decline one). Please leave a comment if you have any questions.

The information below is gathered from sources included PubMed, the CDC, the Mayo Clinic, and package inserts published from the vaccine manufacturer. (See below for a full list) Be sure to check out the other posts on this series (Hepatitis B and Rotavirus).


The Disease

Polio or Poliomyelitis is derived from two Greek words: polio (grey) and myelon (marrow of the spinal cord). This name illustrates the effect poliomyelitis virus has on the spinal cord which leads to the characteristic paralysis we all associate with the disease. Interestingly, 95% of polio infection is subclinical meaning that the virus causes no symptoms.

The poliovirus is a member of the enterovirus subgroup which means that it has the ability to multiply in the gastrointestinal tract and is stable at an acid pH.

Humans are the only known reservoir for the virus.


Prevalence

At one point, transmission of poliovirus infection occurred around the globe. It has now been declared eradicated in the western hemisphere. Currently Pakistan, Afghanistan and Nigeria are the only countries where poliovirus is labeled as endemic (living within a geographical area).  

It is known that the ecology and herd immunity characteristics of polioviruses are heavily dependent upon levels of hygiene (pg 290). The poliovirus will mainly infect children under 5 years old and populations living in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, where sanitation is poor and access to clean water is limited.

Wild polio viruses ceased to circulate in most of the United States by 1970, at which time only 65 percent of children were receiving a complete course of live oral polio vaccine. (Pg 290)

From 1923 to 1953, before the Salk killed-virus vaccine was introduced, the polio death rate in the United States and England had already declined on its own by 47 percent and 55 percent, respectively. Source: International Mortality Statistics (1981) by Michael Alderson.


Complications

A person’s response to a poliovirus infection can be highly variable and is categorized on the severity of their symptoms.

Nearly 95% of all poliovirus cases are asymptomatic or inapparent and less then 1% will lead to flaccid (reduced muscle tone) paralysis. Many people with paralytic polio will recover completely and the majority will experience muscle function return in various degrees.

1-2% of infected individuals will suffer from nonparalytic aseptic meningitis (stiffness of the neck, back or legs). Typically these symptoms will last from 2 to 10 days followed by a complete recovery.

Death rates for paralytic polio cases (remember this is <1% of cases) are approximately 2-5% for children with higher numbers seen in adults (15-30%). 



The Vaccines

I will only be discussing in detail the IPV (injectable polio) vaccines since the OPV (live, oral polio) vaccine is no longer employed in the US since 2000. This is due to the efforts to eliminate VAPP (vaccine-associated paralytic polio, aka polio caused by the oral vaccine).

It is believed that 90 percent of individuals who receive the polio vaccine will develop antibodies to all three polio virus types after two doses with 99% following the third dose. Protection is assumed and correlated with the presence of antibodies.

Because the injectable vaccine (IPV) produces less gastrointestinal immunity then the oral vaccine, persons who complete the schedule with the IPV are more readily infected with wild-type polio then OPV recipients.

Duration of immunity from IPV is not known, however it is assumed to provide “many years” of protection after the complete series is finished (according to the CDC).

There are three combination vaccines doctors use in the US that contain the inactivated polio vaccine. The acceptable schedule approved by the ACIP for IPV consists of four doses (2 months, 4months, 6-18 months, and 4 years). The first three doses are routinely administered with other vaccines.


IPOL (Sanofi Pasteur)

IPOL is the only singleton polio vaccine and can be used in children 6 weeks old to adulthood.

According to the package insert, interruption of the recommended schedule with a delay between doses does not interfere with the final immunity. There is no need to start the series over again, regardless of the time elapsed between doses.

Pediarix (GlaxoSmithKline)

Pediatrix contains DtaP, hepatitis B and IPV – this vaccine can be used for the first 3 doses (2month, 4month, 6-18 months) of the DtaP series among ages 6weeks through 6 years.

Each 0.5-mL dose contains aluminum as an adjuvant (not more than 850 mcg aluminum), ≤100 mcg of residual formaldehyde and ≤100 mcg of polysorbate 80 (Tween 80).

The safety study performed in the US for licensure consisted of a control group (335 infants) receiving the Hib conjugate vaccine (Wyeth; no longer licensed in the US) and 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Wyeth). No saline solution group was employed.

The rate of fever (greater then 100.4 degrees F) is significantly higher in the group that received Pediarix compared to separately administered vaccines. Other statistically significant adverse events include: pain, redness, swelling, drowsiness, irritability, and loss of appetite.

It is noted in the package insert that some cases of SIDS can be expected to follow receipt of pertussis-containing vaccines.


Kinrix (GlaxoSmithKline)

Kinrix contains DtaP and IPV – this vaccine is approved for children 4 yrs-6yrs which means that Kinrix is normally employed for the 5th dose of DtaP and fourth dose of IPV.

Each 0.5-mL dose contains aluminum as an adjuvant (not more than 60 mcg aluminum), ≤100 mcg of residual formaldehyde and ≤100 mcg of polysorbate 80 (Tween 80).

Adverse side effects reviewed in the clinical trials that were statistically significant were pain (statistically higher compared to IPOL), redness, swelling, drowsiness, loss of appetite and fever (statistically higher compared to IPOL). The placebo group used in clinical trials to assess safety was IPOL+Infanrix. No saline solution group was employed.


Pentacel (Sanofi Pasteur)

Pentacel contains DtaP, Hib and IPV – when this vaccine is used to provide the recommended 4 doses, an additional booster dose is suggested at age 4-6 years. This will result in a 5-dose IPV series.

Each 0.5 mL dose includes aluminum as an adjuvant  (330 mcg aluminum), polysorbate 80 (approximately 10 ppm by calculation), and ≤5 mcg  residual formaldehyde.

The placebo group used to assess safety was the Daptacel vaccine, Daptacel+IPOL+ActHIB and Daptacel+ActHIB. No saline solution group was employed.

Significant adverse events reviewed in the clinical trials were fever, decreased activity (lethargy), inconsolable crying and irritability.

Pentacel is the most reactive vaccine for polio. Serious adverse events 30 days after vaccination were reported more often then any other control groups in the safety assessment. Of these adverse reaction, events reported consist of: bronchiolitis, dehydration, pneumonia, asthma and gastroenteritis.



OPV

All of the vaccines listed above are inactivated poliovirus vaccines which do not contain live viruses, so they cannot cause VAPP (vaccine associated polio paralysis). However, the oral polio vaccine (OPV) is still administered to children and adults in countries around the world.

It is said that the advantages of using OPV in developing nations seem to outweigh the risk of vaccine-induced polio (the OPV is more cost effective). However, mutant strains (virus revertants) of vaccine-virus polio have been reported and have infected people in Hispaniola, the Philippines and Madagascar.


SV40 Contamination

SV40 (simian vacuolating virus 40) is a DNA-virus found in monkeys that has the potential to cause tumors. It was discovered in 1960, that same year SV40 was found to contaminate IPV vaccines.

That next year, in 1961, the virus was found to cause tumors in rodents. Following that discovery, the US government required new stocks of polio vaccine free of SV40.

The contaminated vaccines were not recalled and continued to be used for 3 more years following the discovery. Over 98 million US citizens received at least one dose of polio vaccine contaminated with SV40.

The current inactivatd polio vaccines (IPV) are free of contamination that we are curretly able to test for.


Whenever you make a health care decision for yourself or your child, especially one that involves a pharmaceutical product such as a vaccine, you should consider obtaining information from many different sources as well as consulting your health care professional.

Becoming an informed health care consumer is important and will empower you to ask doctors important questions and ultimately help you to take control of your health choices.

If your doctor is not supportive of your informed health choices, consider consulting another doctor who will work with you as a partner helping you make important health care decisions for yourself or your child(ren).



Information presented on this post can be reviewed in depth from the following sources:








Marx A, Glass JD, Sutter RW. Differential Diagnoses of Acute Flaccid Paralysis and It’s Role in Poliomyelitis Surveillance. Epidemiologic Reviews 2000; 22(2): 298-316.  

Preventing Another SV40 Tragedy: Are Today's Vaccine Safety Protocols Effective?  US House Government Reform Transcript, Nov 13, 2003

The SV-40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused an Increase in Cancer? US House Government Reform Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness: - Sept 10, 2003